Presarium Vestibulares
Interpretação de texto · UEL

Interpretação de texto: questões do UEL

12 questões de Interpretação de texto (Inglês) no UEL (2021–2026). Treine de graça com correção e comentário.

Criar conta grátis10 questões por dia, sem cartão de crédito.

Questões de Interpretação de texto no UEL

Uma amostra das questões. Crie uma conta para resolver todas com correção e comentário.

UEL20261a faseQuestao 25InglêsInterpretação de textoMedia
Leia o texto a seguir. https://lisbonquake.com Com base no texto, assinale a alternativa que apresenta, corretamente, o objetivo da experiência descrita.
Imagens anexadas
  1. A)Transmitir dados científicos e explicações técnicas sobre a origem de terremotos e tsunamis, por meio do uso de simuladores.
  2. B)Conduzir os visitantes a uma vivência sensorial que explora aspectos históricos, científicos e culturais do terremoto de Lisboa.
  3. C)Causar uma atividade sísmica de forma a promover uma experiência real do fenômeno.
  4. D)Alertar os moradores de Lisboa sobre o risco de terremotos e tsunamis e possíveis rotas de escape.
  5. E)Promover uma experiência visual e tátil aos interessados, incluindo gestantes e cardíacos.
UEL20261a faseQuestao 32InglêsInterpretação de textoMedia
Em relação à preocupação expressa por Wren Hinks no texto, assinale a alternativa correta.
Imagens anexadas
  1. A)As políticas de Trump causarão novos protestos nos Estados Unidos.
  2. B)Os EUA se tornarão dependentes de organizações internacionais.
  3. C)As agências científicas federais estão se concentrando demais em questões ambientais.
  4. D)Os habitantes de Nashville serão amplamente prejudicados na oferta de alimentos.
  5. E)O corte de programas científicos prejudicará o bem-estar público.
UEL20261a faseQuestao 33InglêsInterpretação de textoMedia
Com base no texto, considere as afirmativas a seguir. I. Os protestos ocorridos em 07 de março de 2025 focaram nos cortes de financiamento aplicados às organizações locais de direitos humanos e de igualdade de gênero. II. A eliminação de programas e os cortes orçamentários às agências científicas promovidos pelo governo Trump tiveram como consequência imediata um aumento da confiança pública nas políticas científicas e ambientais do governo. III. Os cortes sucessivos de financiamentos e a eliminação de programas específicos desencadearam um movimento de resistência da comunidade científica, refletindo a preocupação com os efeitos dessas medidas para a sociedade e o meio ambiente. IV. O movimento “Stand Up for Science” surgiu como uma resposta aos impactos adversos provocados pela administração Trump, como a eliminação de programas de saúde global, a descontinuação de políticas ambientais e os cortes no financiamento da pesquisa científica. Assinale a alternativa correta.
Imagens anexadas
  1. A)Somente as afirmativas I e II são corretas.
  2. B)Somente as afirmativas I e IV são corretas.
  3. C)Somente as afirmativas III e IV são corretas.
  4. D)Somente as afirmativas I, II e III são corretas.
  5. E)Somente as afirmativas II, III e IV são corretas.
UEL20261a faseQuestao 46InglêsInterpretação de textoMedia
Leia o texto a seguir. Adaptado de: https://www.space.com Com base no texto, considere as afirmativas a seguir. I. O aumento da atividade solar contribui para o aparecimento mais frequente e mais ao sul do fenômeno das auroras boreais. II. Auroras ocorrem quando partículas solares carregadas interagem com gases atmosféricos nas camadas superiores da Terra, desencadeando fenômenos luminosos. III. Para observar as Luzes do Norte, recomenda-se ir para centros urbanos com iluminação pública reduzida. IV. Aplicativos e sites comuns de previsão do tempo, como os que mostram a chuva e a temperatura, são suficientes para fornecer dados precisos sobre as auroras boreais. Assinale a alternativa correta.
Imagens anexadas
  1. A)Somente as afirmativas I e II são corretas.
  2. B)Somente as afirmativas I e IV são corretas.
  3. C)Somente as afirmativas III e IV são corretas.
  4. D)Somente as afirmativas I, II e III são corretas.
  5. E)Somente as afirmativas II, III e IV são corretas.
UEL20261a faseQuestao 48InglêsInterpretação de textoMedia
Leia o texto a seguir. Adaptado de: https://www.amazon.com/ Com base no texto, considere as afirmativas a seguir. I. O estudo dos relâmpagos vulcânicos, apresentado no livro, permite compreender os efeitos visuais das erupções, considerando sua dinâmica interna. II. A análise da frequência e intensidade dos relâmpagos pode fornecer pistas sobre o estilo da erupção vulcânica. III. O livro apresenta uma conexão entre diferentes áreas da ciência para aprofundar a compreensão do fenômeno estudado. IV. Os dados científicos atuais ainda são muito limitados, assim como nos primeiros relatos de observação dos relâmpagos. Assinale a alternativa correta.
Imagens anexadas
  1. A)Somente as afirmativas I e II são corretas.
  2. B)Somente as afirmativas I e IV são corretas.
  3. C)Somente as afirmativas III e IV são corretas.
  4. D)Somente as afirmativas I, II e III são corretas.
  5. E)Somente as afirmativas II, III e IV são corretas.
UEL20221a faseQuestao 48InglêsInterpretação de textoMedia
Read the text and answer the questions. The Washington Post Opinion: Brazil's racist wave of mass incarceration Fausto Salvadori is a reporter for the news site Ponte Jornalismo in Brazil. A few days ago, my son-in-law told me that he was on a walk with my daughter and grandson in the center of São Paulo, the most populous city in Brazil, when a group of police officers approached them. My 2-year-old grandson didn't understand why the officers were pointing a gun at his father. I am 40 years older than him, and I don't understand it either, much less accept it, although I know that situations like this are frequent in Brazil. Unlike my son-in-law, I don't usually go through this. But I'm White. He's Black. In a country that for so long has lied to itself by asserting that it is a "racial democracy", I can say that the police have rarely approached me on the street, but my son-in-law says that at one point, he was accosted 20 times in a single year. This situation represents a real lethal threat for Black people: They constitute 56 percent of Brazilians but account for 79 percent of those killed by the police. There's also the fear of being detained; 67 percent of the prison population is Black. The Anti-Drug Act, approved in 2006, accelerated a mass incarceration process that mainly affects Black and poor people and that the Brazilian government had been promoting since the 1990s. Following this law, the number of people incarcerated for drug crimes increased by 156 percent, according to research by Una guerra adictiva. Now, 1 in 3 prisoners is in jail because of this law. In the case of women, that percentage is over 60. This kind of incarceration – carried out in the name of the War on Drugs – is part of the reason Brazil is the country with the third-largest prison population globally. With about 750,000 inmates, it's behind only the United States and China. (www.washingtonpost.com) The Washington Post Opinion: Brazil’s racist wave of mass incarceration Fausto Salvadori is a reporter for the news site Ponte Jornalismo in Brazil. A few days ago, my son-in-law told me that he was on a walk with my daughter and grandson in the center of São Paulo, the most populous city in Brazil, when a group of police officers approached them. My 2-year-old grandson didn’t understand why the officers were pointing a gun at his father. I am 40 years older than him, and I don’t understand it either, much less accept it, although I know that situations like this are frequent in Brazil. Unlike my son-in-law, I don’t usually go through this. But I’m White. He’s Black. In a country that for so long has lied to itself by asserting that it is a “racial democracy”, I can say that the police have rarely approached me on the street, but my son-in-law says that at one point, he was accosted 20 times in a single year. This situation represents a real lethal threat for Black people: They constitute 56 percent of Brazilians but account for 79 percent of those killed by the police. There’s also the fear of being detained; 67 percent of the prison population is Black. The Anti-Drug Act, approved in 2006, accelerated a mass incarceration process that mainly affects Black and poor people and that the Brazilian government had been promoting since the 1990s. Following this law, the number of people incarcerated for drug crimes increased by 156 percent, according to research by Una guerra adictiva. Now, 1 in 3 prisoners is in jail because of this law. In the case of women, that percentage is over 60. This kind of incarceration – carried out in the name of the War on Drugs – is part of the reason Brazil is the country with the third-largest prison population globally. With about 750,000 inmates, it’s behind only the United States and China. www.washingtonpost.com De acordo com Fausto Salvadori, a Lei Antidrogas, aprovada em 2006, tem sido responsável
  1. A)pela correção da discrepância racial da população carcerária no Brasil, que era majoritariamente negra na década de 1990.
  2. B)pelo enfrentamento eficaz de consumo e porte de drogas no Brasil, comprovado pela taxa de encarceramento.
  3. C)pelo vertiginoso crescimento da população carcerária no Brasil.
  4. D)pelo planejamento de políticas públicas em outros países, como Estados Unidos e China, no enfrentamento do consumo e porte de drogas.
  5. E)pelo encarceramento desproporcional entre homens e mulheres.
UEL20221a faseQuestao 49InglêsInterpretação de textoMedia
Read the text and answer the questions. The Washington Post Opinion: Brazil's racist wave of mass incarceration Fausto Salvadori is a reporter for the news site Ponte Jornalismo in Brazil. A few days ago, my son-in-law told me that he was on a walk with my daughter and grandson in the center of São Paulo, the most populous city in Brazil, when a group of police officers approached them. My 2-year-old grandson didn't understand why the officers were pointing a gun at his father. I am 40 years older than him, and I don't understand it either, much less accept it, although I know that situations like this are frequent in Brazil. Unlike my son-in-law, I don't usually go through this. But I'm White. He's Black. In a country that for so long has lied to itself by asserting that it is a "racial democracy", I can say that the police have rarely approached me on the street, but my son-in-law says that at one point, he was accosted 20 times in a single year. This situation represents a real lethal threat for Black people: They constitute 56 percent of Brazilians but account for 79 percent of those killed by the police. There's also the fear of being detained; 67 percent of the prison population is Black. The Anti-Drug Act, approved in 2006, accelerated a mass incarceration process that mainly affects Black and poor people and that the Brazilian government had been promoting since the 1990s. Following this law, the number of people incarcerated for drug crimes increased by 156 percent, according to research by Una guerra adictiva. Now, 1 in 3 prisoners is in jail because of this law. In the case of women, that percentage is over 60. This kind of incarceration – carried out in the name of the War on Drugs – is part of the reason Brazil is the country with the third-largest prison population globally. With about 750,000 inmates, it's behind only the United States and China. (www.washingtonpost.com) The Washington Post Opinion: Brazil’s racist wave of mass incarceration Fausto Salvadori is a reporter for the news site Ponte Jornalismo in Brazil. A few days ago, my son-in-law told me that he was on a walk with my daughter and grandson in the center of São Paulo, the most populous city in Brazil, when a group of police officers approached them. My 2-year-old grandson didn’t understand why the officers were pointing a gun at his father. I am 40 years older than him, and I don’t understand it either, much less accept it, although I know that situations like this are frequent in Brazil. Unlike my son-in-law, I don’t usually go through this. But I’m White. He’s Black. In a country that for so long has lied to itself by asserting that it is a “racial democracy”, I can say that the police have rarely approached me on the street, but my son-in-law says that at one point, he was accosted 20 times in a single year. This situation represents a real lethal threat for Black people: They constitute 56 percent of Brazilians but account for 79 percent of those killed by the police. There’s also the fear of being detained; 67 percent of the prison population is Black. The Anti-Drug Act, approved in 2006, accelerated a mass incarceration process that mainly affects Black and poor people and that the Brazilian government had been promoting since the 1990s. Following this law, the number of people incarcerated for drug crimes increased by 156 percent, according to research by Una guerra adictiva. Now, 1 in 3 prisoners is in jail because of this law. In the case of women, that percentage is over 60. This kind of incarceration – carried out in the name of the War on Drugs – is part of the reason Brazil is the country with the third-largest prison population globally. With about 750,000 inmates, it’s behind only the United States and China. www.washingtonpost.com Sobre os motivos pelos quais o autor narra um fato ocorrido com membros de sua família, considere as afirmativas a seguir. I. Exemplificar abordagens agressivas que, embora aconteçam somente com negros, são pouco recorrentes. II. Dar ao texto também o caráter de opinião, tendo em vista a coluna na qual o publicou. III. Personificar o argumento que desenvolverá depois com dados de pesquisas. IV. Desvelar a disparidade das abordagens policiais em decorrência da cor da pele. Assinale a alternativa correta.
  1. A)Somente as afirmativas I e II são corretas.
  2. B)Somente as afirmativas I e IV são corretas.
  3. C)Somente as afirmativas III e IV são corretas.
  4. D)Somente as afirmativas I, II e III são corretas.
  5. E)Somente as afirmativas II, III e IV são corretas.
UEL20221a faseQuestao 50InglêsInterpretação de textoMedia
Read the text and answer the questions. The Washington Post Opinion: Brazil's racist wave of mass incarceration Fausto Salvadori is a reporter for the news site Ponte Jornalismo in Brazil. A few days ago, my son-in-law told me that he was on a walk with my daughter and grandson in the center of São Paulo, the most populous city in Brazil, when a group of police officers approached them. My 2-year-old grandson didn't understand why the officers were pointing a gun at his father. I am 40 years older than him, and I don't understand it either, much less accept it, although I know that situations like this are frequent in Brazil. Unlike my son-in-law, I don't usually go through this. But I'm White. He's Black. In a country that for so long has lied to itself by asserting that it is a "racial democracy", I can say that the police have rarely approached me on the street, but my son-in-law says that at one point, he was accosted 20 times in a single year. This situation represents a real lethal threat for Black people: They constitute 56 percent of Brazilians but account for 79 percent of those killed by the police. There's also the fear of being detained; 67 percent of the prison population is Black. The Anti-Drug Act, approved in 2006, accelerated a mass incarceration process that mainly affects Black and poor people and that the Brazilian government had been promoting since the 1990s. Following this law, the number of people incarcerated for drug crimes increased by 156 percent, according to research by Una guerra adictiva. Now, 1 in 3 prisoners is in jail because of this law. In the case of women, that percentage is over 60. This kind of incarceration – carried out in the name of the War on Drugs – is part of the reason Brazil is the country with the third-largest prison population globally. With about 750,000 inmates, it's behind only the United States and China. (www.washingtonpost.com) The Washington Post Opinion: Brazil’s racist wave of mass incarceration Fausto Salvadori is a reporter for the news site Ponte Jornalismo in Brazil. A few days ago, my son-in-law told me that he was on a walk with my daughter and grandson in the center of São Paulo, the most populous city in Brazil, when a group of police officers approached them. My 2-year-old grandson didn’t understand why the officers were pointing a gun at his father. I am 40 years older than him, and I don’t understand it either, much less accept it, although I know that situations like this are frequent in Brazil. Unlike my son-in-law, I don’t usually go through this. But I’m White. He’s Black. In a country that for so long has lied to itself by asserting that it is a “racial democracy”, I can say that the police have rarely approached me on the street, but my son-in-law says that at one point, he was accosted 20 times in a single year. This situation represents a real lethal threat for Black people: They constitute 56 percent of Brazilians but account for 79 percent of those killed by the police. There’s also the fear of being detained; 67 percent of the prison population is Black. The Anti-Drug Act, approved in 2006, accelerated a mass incarceration process that mainly affects Black and poor people and that the Brazilian government had been promoting since the 1990s. Following this law, the number of people incarcerated for drug crimes increased by 156 percent, according to research by Una guerra adictiva. Now, 1 in 3 prisoners is in jail because of this law. In the case of women, that percentage is over 60. This kind of incarceration – carried out in the name of the War on Drugs – is part of the reason Brazil is the country with the third-largest prison population globally. With about 750,000 inmates, it’s behind only the United States and China. www.washingtonpost.com De acordo com o autor do texto, assinale a alternativa correta.
  1. A)O Brasil não é uma democracia racial como vem afirmando ser.
  2. B)Cerca de 80% dos encarcerados no Brasil são negros.
  3. C)Aproximadamente 70% da população negra é pobre.
  4. D)A Lei Antidrogas já vem sendo aplicada desde 1990 e vem contribuindo para a redução da criminalidade.
  5. E)O perfil das mulheres encarceradas no Brasil é formado por pobres, negras e acima de 60 anos de idade.
UEL20211a faseQuestao 47InglêsInterpretação de textoMedia
Solving ‘The Social Dilemma’ With Emotional Intelligence ‘The Social Dilemma’ calls for regulation of social media, but here’s how we can regulate ourselves. Social media isn’t pure evil, and it isn’t the only technology that is potentially problematic. In a world in which powerful companies are competing to sell our attention to the highest bidder, this is a call for us to pay more attention to ourselves. It’s a call to practice understanding how we feel, what we actually want, and how to tap into our power to take action. The Netflix documentary, “The Social Dilemma”, tells the story of how the technologists behind social media are intentionally changing our behavior to turn us into “easy prey for advertisers and propagandists,” as Devika Girish summarizes in The New York Times review of the film. “The Social Dilemma” is accused by some of telling this story in an overdramatic way, but it nevertheless contains valuable insight into our relationship with social media. The content and features put in front of us by services like Instagram are not random. Social media is designed to change our behavior and our emotions – often, in ways that we did not explicitly consent to and which may not align with our goals and values. We live in a society that conditions us to distract ourselves from our emotions so much that it hurts our ability to know ourselves, know what matters to us, and to live the lives we want. To compensate for our lack of self-awareness, we sometimes take on the emotions and values other people, or algorithms, tell us to have. We follow leaders that don’t deserve us because they tell us how to feel and why, and they permit us to express ourselves in certain ways. We let algorithms tell us what we want because it’s easier than asking ourselves what we need. This works well for social media companies like Facebook and Instagram because they sell the ability for a third-party to change our behavior. This third-party’s intention may be to sell us a product (you know, the one that keeps coming up in your feed), win our political allegiance, or convince us that the world is flat. The problem is, we don’t know the goals of these third-party organizations and we didn’t consent to be influenced by them. They may motivate us to do something that we would not independently choose. Gradually, more and more of how we feel, what we think, and what we do may not be motivated by our own values and goals. Our emotions, thoughts, and actions could instead be influenced by the highest bidder for our attention, making it even more challenging to understand ourselves and making us even more vulnerable to influence from outside. Regularly checking in with yourself, at least as much as you check your Instagram feed, can help you understand how your relationship with social media needs to change, and it can give you the willpower to take action. KELLY, Kristi. Solving ‘The Social Dilemma’ With Emotional Intelligence. Publicado em 21/09/2020. //medium.com. É correto afirmar que a principal mensagem do texto Solving ‘The Social Dilemma’ With Emotional Intelligence é
  1. A)desmistificar a imagem negativa que a mídia em geral divulga das empresas de tecnologia.
  2. B)apontar os fatores sociais que nos desviam dos nossos objetivos e do autoconhecimento.
  3. C)chamar a atenção para o papel que os algoritmos desempenham na sociedade contemporânea.
  4. D)explicar como funcionam as propagandas e as vendas veiculadas por meio das mídias sociais.
  5. E)alertar as pessoas para que sejam mais conscientes sobre suas próprias emoções, ações e desejos.
UEL20211a faseQuestao 48InglêsInterpretação de textoMedia
Solving ‘The Social Dilemma’ With Emotional Intelligence ‘The Social Dilemma’ calls for regulation of social media, but here’s how we can regulate ourselves. Social media isn’t pure evil, and it isn’t the only technology that is potentially problematic. In a world in which powerful companies are competing to sell our attention to the highest bidder, this is a call for us to pay more attention to ourselves. It’s a call to practice understanding how we feel, what we actually want, and how to tap into our power to take action. The Netflix documentary, “The Social Dilemma”, tells the story of how the technologists behind social media are intentionally changing our behavior to turn us into “easy prey for advertisers and propagandists,” as Devika Girish summarizes in The New York Times review of the film. “The Social Dilemma” is accused by some of telling this story in an overdramatic way, but it nevertheless contains valuable insight into our relationship with social media. The content and features put in front of us by services like Instagram are not random. Social media is designed to change our behavior and our emotions – often, in ways that we did not explicitly consent to and which may not align with our goals and values. We live in a society that conditions us to distract ourselves from our emotions so much that it hurts our ability to know ourselves, know what matters to us, and to live the lives we want. To compensate for our lack of self-awareness, we sometimes take on the emotions and values other people, or algorithms, tell us to have. We follow leaders that don’t deserve us because they tell us how to feel and why, and they permit us to express ourselves in certain ways. We let algorithms tell us what we want because it’s easier than asking ourselves what we need. This works well for social media companies like Facebook and Instagram because they sell the ability for a third-party to change our behavior. This third-party’s intention may be to sell us a product (you know, the one that keeps coming up in your feed), win our political allegiance, or convince us that the world is flat. The problem is, we don’t know the goals of these third-party organizations and we didn’t consent to be influenced by them. They may motivate us to do something that we would not independently choose. Gradually, more and more of how we feel, what we think, and what we do may not be motivated by our own values and goals. Our emotions, thoughts, and actions could instead be influenced by the highest bidder for our attention, making it even more challenging to understand ourselves and making us even more vulnerable to influence from outside. Regularly checking in with yourself, at least as much as you check your Instagram feed, can help you understand how your relationship with social media needs to change, and it can give you the willpower to take action. KELLY, Kristi. Solving ‘The Social Dilemma’ With Emotional Intelligence. Publicado em 21/09/2020. //medium.com. Em relação ao documentário The social dilemma, considere as afirmativas a seguir. I. O documentário suscita reflexões importantes sobre a relação das pessoas com as mídias sociais. II. A história do documentário foi elaborada por profissionais da mídia escrita e da propaganda. III. O objetivo do documentário é fazer com que as pessoas deixem de utilizar as redes sociais. IV. O roteiro busca denunciar como as empresas trabalham para influenciar nosso comportamento nas mídias sociais. Assinale a alternativa correta.
  1. A)Somente as afirmativas I e II são corretas.
  2. B)Somente as afirmativas I e IV são corretas.
  3. C)Somente as afirmativas III e IV são corretas.
  4. D)Somente as afirmativas I, II e III são corretas.
  5. E)Somente as afirmativas II, III e IV são corretas.
UEL20211a faseQuestao 49InglêsInterpretação de textoMedia
Solving ‘The Social Dilemma’ With Emotional Intelligence ‘The Social Dilemma’ calls for regulation of social media, but here’s how we can regulate ourselves. Social media isn’t pure evil, and it isn’t the only technology that is potentially problematic. In a world in which powerful companies are competing to sell our attention to the highest bidder, this is a call for us to pay more attention to ourselves. It’s a call to practice understanding how we feel, what we actually want, and how to tap into our power to take action. The Netflix documentary, “The Social Dilemma”, tells the story of how the technologists behind social media are intentionally changing our behavior to turn us into “easy prey for advertisers and propagandists,” as Devika Girish summarizes in The New York Times review of the film. “The Social Dilemma” is accused by some of telling this story in an overdramatic way, but it nevertheless contains valuable insight into our relationship with social media. The content and features put in front of us by services like Instagram are not random. Social media is designed to change our behavior and our emotions – often, in ways that we did not explicitly consent to and which may not align with our goals and values. We live in a society that conditions us to distract ourselves from our emotions so much that it hurts our ability to know ourselves, know what matters to us, and to live the lives we want. To compensate for our lack of self-awareness, we sometimes take on the emotions and values other people, or algorithms, tell us to have. We follow leaders that don’t deserve us because they tell us how to feel and why, and they permit us to express ourselves in certain ways. We let algorithms tell us what we want because it’s easier than asking ourselves what we need. This works well for social media companies like Facebook and Instagram because they sell the ability for a third-party to change our behavior. This third-party’s intention may be to sell us a product (you know, the one that keeps coming up in your feed), win our political allegiance, or convince us that the world is flat. The problem is, we don’t know the goals of these third-party organizations and we didn’t consent to be influenced by them. They may motivate us to do something that we would not independently choose. Gradually, more and more of how we feel, what we think, and what we do may not be motivated by our own values and goals. Our emotions, thoughts, and actions could instead be influenced by the highest bidder for our attention, making it even more challenging to understand ourselves and making us even more vulnerable to influence from outside. Regularly checking in with yourself, at least as much as you check your Instagram feed, can help you understand how your relationship with social media needs to change, and it can give you the willpower to take action. KELLY, Kristi. Solving ‘The Social Dilemma’ With Emotional Intelligence. Publicado em 21/09/2020. //medium.com. Em relação ao texto apresentado, atribua V (verdadeiro) ou F (falso) às afirmativas a seguir. ( ) Desconhecemos as reais intenções das empresas que têm acesso às nossas informações via redes sociais. ( ) Há a probabilidade de as pessoas fazerem escolhas que normalmente não fariam devido à influência das redes sociais. ( ) As mídias sociais disputam nossa atenção o tempo todo por motivos predominantemente comerciais. ( ) A aleatoriedade dos conteúdos das mídias sociais serve para alterar o comportamento e as emoções das pessoas. ( ) Por desconhecermos o que sentimos e queremos, adotamos os sentimentos e as vontades que as mídias sociais nos apresentam. Assinale a alternativa que contém, de cima para baixo, a sequência correta.
  1. A)V, V, F, F, V.
  2. B)V, F, V, V, F.
  3. C)V, F, F, V, V.
  4. D)F, V, F, F, V.
  5. E)F, F, V, V, F.
UEL20211a faseQuestao 50InglêsInterpretação de textoMedia
Solving ‘The Social Dilemma’ With Emotional Intelligence ‘The Social Dilemma’ calls for regulation of social media, but here’s how we can regulate ourselves. Social media isn’t pure evil, and it isn’t the only technology that is potentially problematic. In a world in which powerful companies are competing to sell our attention to the highest bidder, this is a call for us to pay more attention to ourselves. It’s a call to practice understanding how we feel, what we actually want, and how to tap into our power to take action. The Netflix documentary, “The Social Dilemma”, tells the story of how the technologists behind social media are intentionally changing our behavior to turn us into “easy prey for advertisers and propagandists,” as Devika Girish summarizes in The New York Times review of the film. “The Social Dilemma” is accused by some of telling this story in an overdramatic way, but it nevertheless contains valuable insight into our relationship with social media. The content and features put in front of us by services like Instagram are not random. Social media is designed to change our behavior and our emotions – often, in ways that we did not explicitly consent to and which may not align with our goals and values. We live in a society that conditions us to distract ourselves from our emotions so much that it hurts our ability to know ourselves, know what matters to us, and to live the lives we want. To compensate for our lack of self-awareness, we sometimes take on the emotions and values other people, or algorithms, tell us to have. We follow leaders that don’t deserve us because they tell us how to feel and why, and they permit us to express ourselves in certain ways. We let algorithms tell us what we want because it’s easier than asking ourselves what we need. This works well for social media companies like Facebook and Instagram because they sell the ability for a third-party to change our behavior. This third-party’s intention may be to sell us a product (you know, the one that keeps coming up in your feed), win our political allegiance, or convince us that the world is flat. The problem is, we don’t know the goals of these third-party organizations and we didn’t consent to be influenced by them. They may motivate us to do something that we would not independently choose. Gradually, more and more of how we feel, what we think, and what we do may not be motivated by our own values and goals. Our emotions, thoughts, and actions could instead be influenced by the highest bidder for our attention, making it even more challenging to understand ourselves and making us even more vulnerable to influence from outside. Regularly checking in with yourself, at least as much as you check your Instagram feed, can help you understand how your relationship with social media needs to change, and it can give you the willpower to take action. KELLY, Kristi. Solving ‘The Social Dilemma’ With Emotional Intelligence. Publicado em 21/09/2020. //medium.com. Sobre a posição da autora com respeito à relação das pessoas com as mídias sociais, assinale a alternativa correta.
  1. A)A abordagem do documentário The social dilemma apresenta uma visão exagerada do impacto das mídias sociais na vida das pessoas.
  2. B)O constante acesso às mídias sociais consiste em uma das formas de verificação da influência que está sendo exercida sobre nós.
  3. C)O uso das mídias sociais para recreação e entretenimento afeta a capacidade das pessoas de conhecerem seus objetivos e valores.
  4. D)O autoconhecimento e a análise de emoções, vontades e valores são formas para diminuir a susceptibilidade às mídias sociais.
  5. E)As mídias sociais agem no sentido de se alinharem aos nossos valores e desejos para conseguirem influenciar nosso comportamento.
Resolver as 12 questões de graça

Veja todas as questões de Inglês do UEL.

Treine direto nas questões reais

No Presarium Vestibulares, você resolve essas questões com correção na hora, comentário e um painel que cruza a incidência com o seu desempenho — e monta sua lista de prioridade automaticamente.

Começar de graça

10 questões por dia, sem cartão de crédito.